> On 4 Sep 2019, at 22:58, Andrew Barnert <abarn...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> On Sep 4, 2019, at 10:17, Anders Hovmöller <bo...@killingar.net> wrote: >> >>> . >> >> Doesn't all that imply that it'd be good if you could just pass it the queue >> object you want? > > Pass it a queue object that you construct? Or a queue factory (which would > default to the SimpleQueue class, but you could pass, e.g., partial(Queue, > max_len=10)? While either of those would be more flexible, it also breaks the > abstraction, and the simplicity of the API.
Well we are talking about the case where the abstraction is broken already so that seems like it's reasonable. > It might still be worth it if anyone had a use case for anything but a fixed > queue length, or a custom type of queue, etc. But I suspect nobody does. Well if the API is changed and we just add the fixed length parameter we'd feel right stupid when the other valid use cases did show up :) /Anders _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/44KVQC3LY7XI4QTXOVTGWD2X7GL23E2S/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
