Hi Philippe, Thanks for preparing the PEP! I also think it will improve the readability a lot in code that heavily uses type annotations.
I'd suggest you to split this PEP in two: one for Union types and another one for Optional. It will facilitate the discussions and reaching consensus since these are actually two separate issues. For example, I endorse the proposal for "|" operator, while I have some reservations about "~" (e.g., ~~x is expected to be x?). I'm not a core developer, though, so maybe they prefer joint PEPs rather than seperate ones. Cheers, Marko Le mar. 17 sept. 2019 à 08:56, Philippe Prados <philippe.pra...@gmail.com> a écrit : > Hello, > > I would like to publish a new PEP (see here > <https://github.com/pprados/peps/blob/master/pep-9999.rst>). > I discussed this idea here > <https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/thread/FCTXGDT2NNKRJQ6CDEPWUXHVG2AAQZZY/> > . > The PEP1 <https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0001/> explains that I must > have a sponsor. > > Who can help me ? > > Thanks > > Philippe Prados > _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org > To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ > Message archived at > https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/WWSOVKGMBCDQBUNJDJYKYKE7FVWHSDU5/ > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/E7XBEGNRQCZTNB44WE4WUUXYZCQAA7YQ/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
