On 21/10/2019 21:14, Dominik Vilsmeier wrote:
Exactly, so the dict "+" behavior would match the set "|" behavior, preserving the keys. But how many users will be
concerned about whether the keys are going to be preserved? I guess almost everybody will want to know what happens with the values, and
that question remains unanswered by just looking at the "+" or "|" syntax. It's reasonable to assume that values are
preserved as well, i.e. `d1 + d2` adds the missing keys from `d2` to `d1`. Of course, once you know that "+" is actually similar
to "update" you can infer that the last value wins.
There's one reason for + which I feel is being missed (though I think
someone may have briefly mentioned it last time this topic was brought
up): If we look at the behaviour of dict literals, adding two dicts
actually behaves like concatenation in the sense that
{"key1": "val1", "key2": "val2", "key1": "val3"} == {"key1": "val3",
"key2": "val2"}
which is exactly what we would get by adding {"key1": "val1", "key2":
"val2"} and {"key1": "val3"}
so using + we would actually have
{"key1": "val1", "key2": "val2"} + {"key1": "val3"} == {"key1": "val1",
"key2": "val2", "key1": "val3"}
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/IRU66KNSTIG2FYE2KCGTCZHWYT22HC44/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
