> > Is this meant to produce a tuple that contains inner tuples, or is it > the same as tuple(i for i in range(10)) ? This would be equivalent to tuple(i for i in range(10))
> Is the comma just magic that says "tuple comprehension, not genexp"? I think that my proposal is consistent with Python's current tuple syntax, especially for one element: ((1,),) # all very similar, but ((1,),) ((1,)) # (1,) ((1),) # (1,) ((1)) # 1 I would say the comma says "tuple, not expression": (1+2)*3 # 9 (1+2,)*3 # (3, 3, 3) _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/4X3ER6UDU3XKMML4F2O5OQW5MRVL6Q5Q/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
