I'll lend a supportive voice here: I like the proposal and would probably
make use of this kind of syntax quite a bit, but I think the requirement of
yield is definitely a necessity. Too much ambiguity without it.

And adding the yield, IMO, doesn't clutter things up too badly. Using one
of the code examples, it looks pretty good to me:

    [
        for row in matrix:
            [
                for cell in row:
                    yield f(cell)
            ]
    ]

Of course, anything that does not contain a yield statement would need to
be a syntax error or it could cause problems when refactoring from
"regular" looping code, and forgetting to add the yield.

---
Ricky.

"I've never met a Kentucky man who wasn't either thinking about going home
or actually going home." - Happy Chandler


On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 3:40 PM Alex Hall <alex.moj...@gmail.com> wrote:

> OK, I think the verdict is in and I will not try to debate it.
>
> > Does opening a [{( and having any : statements inside
> > just imply one more indentation level? Or can the statements inside
> > be validly less indented than the line containing the = [...
> > opening bracket?
>
> I think this is a fun question. I can't think of any good reason to allow
> indenting less than the containing statement, but I'm also wondering if
> there's edge cases I might be missing. If not, then maybe we can indeed
> just require adding another indentation level. And maybe that means that
> statements inside expressions wouldn't require a Rube Goldberg machine ;)
>
> If anyone is curious, I initially wrote [a much larger proposal with
> several overlapping subproposals in which `if`, `try`, and `def` could all
> be used as expressions](
> https://www.reddit.com/r/Python/comments/f5wm1d/proposal_compound_statement_expressions_complex/).
> I figured that was hopelessly ambitious and just submitted the part I liked
> best.
> _______________________________________________
> Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
> Message archived at
> https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/EOUPQCV6EA6H6KDWWVEAXNDP7S5BM3MF/
> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
>
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/M3URIJORY63XUUCXRAXIEOTZ32I7WXR2/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to