Comprehension are very much based on the idea of *declarative* data
collections. That's their entire reason for being. In general, one expects
comprehension to be side-effect free and just build a collection according
to declared rules. Obviously I know many ways to smuggle in side effects,
but doing so goes against their spirit and user expectations.

A comprehension should read as one line. At very least logically, but
usually physically. If I ever find myself wiring a comprehension longer
than about 120 characters, I know it's time to refactor into a function and
block loops. I've cleaned up far too much code that used too-complex nested
comprehension.

Everything about this proposal is antithetical to the intention of
comprehension.

On Sat, Feb 22, 2020, 2:27 AM Alex Hall <alex.moj...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > The weird block structures inside comprehension reads terribly even in
> the trivial case shown
>
> David, it's fine if you have that opinion, but you're replying
> specifically to my post where I asked someone to elaborate on that kind of
> opinion, so it bothers me that you just restated it without explanation.
> I'm curious, in what way does it read terribly? Why are the block
> structures "weird"?
> _______________________________________________
> Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
> Message archived at
> https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/BG426WY2XQQVQVXZK6HYROBXATQ6VVR3/
> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
>
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/KXFODWD7QN3G5XPSQ6DNSNOBWVYYE2VL/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to