> But couldn't you just write a simple helper function/class that handles your > usual workflow?
I do when I’m the one calling subprocess.run() but it’s not possible to do that when it’s a library that does the call. > Why does this deserve in the stdlib? > (The stdlib does very little logging of its own -- logging is up to the > application.) Some parts of the stdlib output some logs like urllib, I think only the configuration of the handlers is up to the application. Is the stdlib not generating logs because of the overhead of calling logging.info()? > It's not logging per se, but the standard library does have an > extensive and growing list of audit events that are intended to assist > with testing, logging and security monitoring. Thanks, It looks like an audit hook could work. _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/P3UU2PNK6OWLYAHQVGXXKFKXROVDH57N/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
