Hello,
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 16:25:07 -0700
Christopher Barker <python...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As others have pointed out, the OP started in a bit of an oblique
> way, but it maybe come down to this:
>
> There are some use-cases for a mutable string type.
For avoidance of doubt: nothing in my RFC has anything to do, or
implies, "a mutable string type". A well-know pattern of string
builder, yes. Piggybacking on existing StringIO/BytesIO classes, yes.
Anything else, no.
To not leave it cut and dry: IMHO, we need more const'ness in Python,
not less. I my dreams I already do stuff like:
from __future__ import const
class Foo:
pass
# This is an alias for "Foo"
Bar: const = Foo
# This is a variable which can store a reference to Foo or any other class
Baz = Foo
[This is not a new RFC! Please start a new thread if you'd like to pick
it up ;-)]
--
Best regards,
Paul mailto:pmis...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/XS6FCMOYALLDJWQDZY33OZDAOM3LFJ47/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
