Andrew Barnert via Python-ideas writes: > But I don’t see why that rules out the “bare colon” form that I and > someone else apparently both proposed in separate sub threads of > this thread: > > { :a, "b": x, :c }
This sort of reminds me of the "leading colon" convention for keywords in Lisp, where a keyword is *defined* to be a symbol whose value is itself. Steve _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/VPFMHYKE2GVDFCFYQWBMDCXKPYY4H7UU/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/