Andrew Barnert via Python-ideas writes:

 > But I don’t see why that rules out the “bare colon” form that I and
 > someone else apparently both proposed in separate sub threads of
 > this thread:
 > 
 >     { :a, "b": x, :c }

This sort of reminds me of the "leading colon" convention for keywords
in Lisp, where a keyword is *defined* to be a symbol whose value is
itself.

Steve
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/VPFMHYKE2GVDFCFYQWBMDCXKPYY4H7UU/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to