I would think that would be a great name, it’s more explicit and fits more in with its siblings “lru_cache” and “cached_property”.
Not to imply that there is a consensus to move forward, I would be interested in knowing what the next steps would be if there was. Would this require a PEP to be submitted? Or is it similar enough to existing functionality that it might not require one? > On 27 Apr 2020, at 19:37, Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net> wrote: > > On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 09:26:53 -0700 > Ethan Furman <et...@stoneleaf.us> wrote: >> >>> Or are you saying that once could be interpreted to mean I cannot do that >>> 2nd def? >> >> That is what I was saying -- that `once`, all by itself, could mean multiple >> things. > > That's a good point. A more explicit spelling would be `@call_once`, > what do you think? > > (that's also the C++ spelling, incidentally, but I suspect most > beginners won't care about that ;-)) > > Regards > > Antoine. > > _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org > To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ > Message archived at > https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/NYOB46XXHLPDK3V7IPQL6IJ6FNE2ZK7S/ > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/REJNSHOQ2Q2GFGVPERFCFBEGXLHZGINV/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
