On Sat, Jun 06, 2020 at 09:31:36PM +0300, Bar Harel wrote: > > > > It's one thing to say that the interpreter takes care of importing > > logging and setting up a basic logger, and that's great, but I still > > have to import logging and call the `logging.info(...)` functions, > > so what does this proposal give us, *in detail* please, and how do I use > > it? > > > > You would be able to easily see the logs already generated by libraries, > without needing to ever modify the Python files.
But if the libraries are already doing logging, can't I already do that? And if the libraries aren't doing logging, this won't magically add logging to them, will it? I think I need to see a (simplified!) but practical example of how this would work, from both the point of view of the library creator, and the library user. Thanks, -- Steven _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/CSA65CJB6GUPM6D2H6RO56JUTL4RI7BE/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
