On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 06:22:34PM +1200, Greg Ewing wrote:
> On 15/06/20 5:11 pm, Steve Barnes wrote:
>
> >Of course if we had a NaN value for integers, int('NaN'), then we could
> >just set the initial count to it and since NaN - anything = NaN all would
> >be golden.
>
> Or we could use floating-point reference counts...
Remind me again, was the aim to speed up the interpreter or slow it
down?
:-)
--
Steven
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/HDOKQ5OPKPX7OSMDVJRZCAU3GCR5UT5M/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
