To read*

Em qui, 18 de jun de 2020 09:30, Daniel. <danielhi...@gmail.com> escreveu:

> I love the do_stuff if cond syntax in Ruby and in perl. It's very natural
> to real, much more to follow than if cond: do_stuff
>
> But still I don't think that it is enough to demand a language change.
>
> Something near this is to have a default of none for
>
> A if B else None
>
> So we can ommit the else None part, but this goes against the explicit is
> better than implicit
>
> Em qua, 17 de jun de 2020 07:42, Paul Moore <p.f.mo...@gmail.com>
> escreveu:
>
>> On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 at 10:44, artem6191 <artem129...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > So yeah, we can "if <expression>: return", but why not?
>>
>> That's the wrong question. The correct question is "why is this
>> needed, and is the need sufficiently pressing to justify the change to
>> the language?"
>>
>> You're talking about allowing "return EXPR if CONDITION" as an exact
>> equivalent of "if CONDITION: return EXPR". There isn't even a benefit
>> of "it saves a line of code", so it's very hard to see a
>> justification.
>>
>> Paul
>> _______________________________________________
>> Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
>> Message archived at
>> https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/PHB2VWU3J2YAGCWZR5N5N2BAGPFBQMF4/
>> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/F6GR23E5G7YVGVH6XEKD3PU63AQZ2BK3/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to