On 2020-07-29 at 07:09:05 -0700, Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> wrote:
> I honestly and strongly believe that we should do nothing here. Python > thrives because it is relatively simple. Adding new syntax to deal > with looping special cases makes it less simple, and encourages a bad > coding style (nested loops, multiple breaks...). I was about to go off on another Get Off My Lawn rant, so thank you for putting this so succintly and so politely. :-) If I end up with more than one flag controlling my search loop, then it's time to break (pun intended) the logic into smaller/simpler pieces rather than to look for a more complicated language construct. _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/V66EY5LEXXTBVYB55NQJXSQNTXFXBVC5/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
