Do you mean the type annotations that Python has had for about ten years? And the typing library that uses them to specify type hints to compilers and other tooling? https://docs.python.org/3/library/typing.html
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 11:07 AM <krishnans2...@gmail.com> wrote: > One suggestion I had for the next Python release is to add > type-implication support. Many developers have learned Python, but do not > want to use it since it is slow. An awesome way to fix this is to have > optional type-implications. For example, if you know for sure that variable > x is an int, you can make Python just a bit smaller by somehow specifying > to the interpreter that the variable is an integer. Something like 'x::int > = 5'. By having optional type implications, you can still do everything you > do with normal Python, except you can speed it up a little bit by telling > the Interpreter that this variable is starting off with this datatype. > _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org > To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ > Message archived at > https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/ZGTZNKOSTNTEA3NLJWERIGC3IHG7WU5B/ > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ > > -- CALVIN SPEALMAN SENIOR QUALITY ENGINEER cspea...@redhat.com M: +1.336.210.5107 [image: https://red.ht/sig] <https://red.ht/sig> TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted>
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/V63JTFW5RLUDJ7DAAD5B7R7MV7KECIQO/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
