On Sat, Aug 29, 2020, 11:42 AM Jonathan Fine <[email protected]> wrote:
> For me, a satisfactory outcome from the current PEP process would be a new > dunder, which I am calling __keyfn__, that has two possible values, > namely None or True. (And of course, the associated syntax and semantics > changes. And documentation changes. These are not minor matters.) > This is obviously a different way of doing things than I have been explaining but it accomplishes nearly the same purpose in a simpler and probably cheaper way. Thank you Jonathan Fine. I would support this version of the idea implementation, too. Mine is far more complicated, as Paul Moore rightly pointed out.
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/7D2PU4IFTRJKTDDN7VW7EIDNMD5LZICB/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
