There's already a proposal. See https://gist.github.com/MaggieMoss/c848cb3a581979f445d075c15629c950 and https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/thread/SWAY6V7WZLVPGYQEMHXJROT2747OXSRX/
On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 9:50 AM Sebastian Noel Lübke <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey, > python 3.9 introduced the | operator for union types. it would be nice to > have something like that for optional types. maybe like > > name: ? int > or > name: int ? > > best regards > Sebastian Lübke > _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ > Message archived at > https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/UPQHZKZTG4UTWKF4Z5GO65PXOZBAEBUT/ > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ > -- Sebastian Kreft
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/327HT6VZ2L6NKGNV6EMF6AS6BPMALLCY/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
