David Mertz writes: > It's cute.
Cute is for bunnies and Ghibli anime. :-) > And really quite readable. But it's not writeable. Heh. They look like misplaced apostrophes on my screen in my English buffers. I'd have to go to a 1.3x (maybe 1.5x) font to be sure what I'm looking at. And I'm an Emacs user, so if I wanted to use this feature (I don't though, I think it's ugly), I'd rebind Ctrl-<single digit> to the superscripts. (I have a little sympathy for non-Emacs users, but really, America, wake up. Characters are good, use more!) So my reaction is the opposite of yours. I prefer the arbitrary tag, where I read for i in iterable as breakable: as "with (for i in iterable) as breakable" in my head. Although I'm basically -0.0 on the whole idea, in my experience anyway it's YAGNI. Steve -- ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ What are those straight lines? "Diversity rules." _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/W6XUXDOMPKNBG3LYXYP5FSLB7ZNWTRQ3/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/