On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 5:21 PM Paul Bryan <[email protected]> wrote:
> I wonder how that is substantially different than:
>
> or perhaps more verbosely, but arguably more readable:
>
> from pathlib import Path
>
> Path() / "foo"
>
> or
from pathlib import Path
Path("foo")
I guess I don't find the proposal or variation worth it to me -- though I
guess it's easier when you are translating code that uses string paths
already -- but not much easier.
-CHB
--
Christopher Barker, PhD (Chris)
Python Language Consulting
- Teaching
- Scientific Software Development
- Desktop GUI and Web Development
- wxPython, numpy, scipy, Cython
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/QY72VXTDW7CIEBPYN6HO6EBNR7XFA72U/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/