I agree, I don't think it justifies a builtin, because it is so simple to just define your own empty class. That said, it does come in handy, and I do use it for same reasons others have expressed.
On Thu, 2021-02-18 at 11:50 +1300, Greg Ewing wrote: > On 18/02/21 3:51 am, Ricky Teachey wrote: > > I would personally love for SimpleNamespace to get a shorter name > > and > > become a built-in. It is a fantastic object to use in all kinds of > > situations > > I find myself disagreeing with that. It's dead simple to define > your own blank-object class, and you get to give it a name that > reflects what you're really doing with it. I don't understand > why there's such a fascination with things like SimpleNamespace. >
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/EMKHIVA27CVGVDJPJHQ4O2BY6IZXDWRN/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
