In August 2020, in the context of PEP 472 I suggested >>> {-} for the empty set literal. At present the closest we can do for an empty set literal is >>> {0} - {0} set()
The context for this is whether PEP 472 should make >>> something[] a syntax error. If we do then, what about the workarounds >>> something[*argv] >>> something[**kwargs] which so to speak convert the syntax error to a run-time error. Because >>> something[] was ugly and easily misunderstood I suggested >>> something[-] and hence >>> {-} as new syntax. The thread from August 2020 can be found (with >>> prompts as quotes) at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/thread/2QANGFBMGUSCYOLU3GJ6AOGV6Q2ATC72/#QOBONXUPUMC3ULCGJU6FVHOCIZQDT45W -- Jonathan
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/TEZUX6EMOLZBMN6GYJC5J5J5KR2QGTOT/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/