09.04.21 21:02, Guido van Rossum пише: > But if there are two proposals with conflicting semantics for the same > syntax that kills both ideas, doesn’t it? Because apparently it’s not > clear what the syntax should mean.
Maybe. But there was also different idea for the "with" statement (with semantic similar to Pascal's). I understand the drawback of this syntax (error handlers are located too far from the guarded code), but I do not have other syntax which would look Pythonic. _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/DGPAYJWL3CUYNGTZ65S6HA7ADW5OFRFZ/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
