Chris wrote: > This is thread-safe: > > from threading import Lock > > lock = Lock() > counter = 0 > def get_next(): > with lock: > global counter > counter += 1 > my_counter = counter
This is a great workaround. I can try to improve this. But first of all should we depend on the user to do this locking? I don't think so. So is it possible to implement this in the background without affecting current performance? _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/MMC4MFCMWH2VZXKKAKVC2NFQJENOMI74/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
