On 2021-06-22 9:25 a.m., Chris Angelico wrote:
> (Oh, and another wrinkle, although a small one: Code objects would
> need to keep track of their modules. Currently functions do, but code
> objects don't. But that seems unlikely to introduce further
> complications.)

What? No you just stop emitting LOAD_ATTR and instead emit LOAD_LOCAL
'__opcode_load_attr_impl__' and call it with the relevant values.

>
> ChrisA
> _______________________________________________
> Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
> Message archived at 
> https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/H5QSWNLWC4HOR3JPXBNDWCSE2QFHXPS6/
> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/GLM2YWGRWHOAIQ7EJOXUNPGPY7HEEZPN/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to