Thank you, that's helpful. Though I really like the future interface, I've used it many times while I never used `multiprocessing.pool.Pool` or its `AsyncResult`. I worry that some of the expectations I've grown to have from `Future` objects would be broken here.
It would be nice if this feature existed in `concurrent.futures`. Thanks, Ram.
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/EJNMKY7BSX4RCDOUU4FJA4TXEWTVXEZV/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
