On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 6:55 AM Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> wrote: > > I like that you're trying to fix this wart! I think that using a different > syntax may be the only way out. My own bikeshed color to try would be `=>`, > assuming we'll introduce `(x) => x+1` as the new lambda syntax, but I can see > problems with both as well :-). >
Sounds good. I can definitely get behind this as the preferred syntax, until such time as we find a serious problem. ChrisA _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/GJJJK3IHNRD3NS2ECMUHIRVCZSJFUBUU/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
