Hi Chris Again you ask good questions.
Q: How to find the bare string '#wibble'? It's optimised out during compilation. A: Very good. I didn't know that. For current Python we'll have to use a different marker. For future Python we could change the compiler so that it directly sets fn.__wibble__ without needing the @wibble decorator. Q: You have at least added some source code to help(fn), if it's available. But what if the function came from a .pyc file? A: It will work the same as tracebacks work, and in exactly the same circumstances. I think that's exactly what we want. Any other solution would increase the size of .pyo files, which is to be avoided. Thank you for your interest. I hope this helps. -- Jonathan
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/YDAKBG553PE4RIVZ3NRFQ46OU3LMEKLC/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
