On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 11:22 PM Rob Cliffe via Python-ideas < python-ideas@python.org> wrote:
> I have more than once advocated > x:=default > (and there is no clash with the walrus operator, even if others have > said/implied that there is). not a clash, but you could have a walrus in the default expression, which could be pretty visually confusing. On the other hand, maybe that's a really bad idea anyway. And otherwise I like it. BTW, => would have a similar problem if it's adopted as a shorter way to spell lambda. And that would be worse, as putting a lambda in a default depression might be good style in some cases :-) -CHB -- Christopher Barker, PhD (Chris) Python Language Consulting - Teaching - Scientific Software Development - Desktop GUI and Web Development - wxPython, numpy, scipy, Cython
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/W4Q23REGWZFV63F7DPTAXWJMM5PR7E4E/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
