Chris Angelico writes: > On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 7:47 PM Stephen J. Turnbull > <stephenjturnb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > There's also implementing zip's strict argument, eg, > > > > def zippymap(func, *iterables, strict=False): > > return map(lambda x: func(*x), zip(*iterables, strict)) > > > > and corresponding zippymappers for any other mappers (including > > filter). This seems like it might be useful extension to the > > functions in the stdlib for the same reason that it's useful for zip > > itself. Even though it's so easy to implement in terms of zip, it > > would be more discoverable as a documented argument to the functions. > > > > Comments? > > Given that I don't actually want a pipeline like this, I'm not the > best one to ask, but I would strongly favour ultra-simple APIs. Ah, but I changed the subject here. Sorry about not making that clear. This isn't a method on a dataflow, it would be a a change to map itself. Steve _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/ZIRHIC4J6EDGASBS7XB5Q2NHCNV326C4/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
