> I'm somewhat ambivalent about this pattern. Sometimes I find it > readable and natural, other times it doesn't fit my intuition for the > problem domain. Like any other pattern, you don't have to subscribe to it and use it to solve every problem. A pattern is just another tool in your toolbox that sometimes fit the problem domain and sometimes doesn't. Personally, I would still use a list comprehension for simple one-liners.
> This isn't a technical problem, it's much more of a teaching and > evangelisation issue. Building a library and promoting it via blogs, > social media, demonstrations, etc, is a much better way of getting > people interested. I do agree that it's also a matter of evangelising this pattern which I think is implied when including this pattern. There should be a lot of teaching involved because we're showing users a different way from what they have been doing all along. And there's also effort to educate users that this pattern does not replace the way they have been doing things. I don't think this is an issue per se, I'm just curious how we will propagate this paradigm. _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/WMMVL5S7GANMY77KJXZQP6DLHNQMI2V5/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
