Abdulla Al Kathiri writes: > Thanks for the clarification. Yeah I agree it will look ugly if we > use it not as a first argument many times in a row but what if > there is one or two functions in the middle that they are not > playing along and don’t have teamwork ethics,
Function definitions or lambdas are cheap. > 1 -> add(2) -> pow(3, _) equivalent to 1 -> add(_, 2) -> pow(3, _). > _ is where your output goes into. _ as a first argument can be omitted. def rpow(x, y): return pow(y, x) 1 -> add(2) -> rpow(3) But in many cases it won't be necessary because you will be defining functions for the pipeline, rather than fitting the pipeline to preexisting functions. _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/CY7IXWBKYBOPTVMB25QVCZ2NI3URNQNM/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
