+1
On Wed, 2022-01-19 at 07:20 +0000, Ben Rudiak-Gould wrote:
> My preferred syntax for a frozenset literal would be something like
>
> {1, 2, 3}.freeze()
>
> This requires no new syntax, and can be safely optimized at compile
> time (as far as I can tell).
>
> set.freeze would be a new method of sets which could also be used at
> run time. It would return a new frozenset object and wouldn't alter
> the set object (so perhaps the name I suggested isn't ideal). Of
> course frozenset.freeze would just return itself.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
> Message archived at
> https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/LYGTXEHMUVVPC3DAHUDLMKLP2574GX5L/
> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/TG7HGCXR3OVR25GPSWXVDRROSUALBES6/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
