Ok, thank you. I will make the issue and pull request once the switch to GitHub issues is done.
On Sun, Mar 6, 2022, at 10:20 AM, Eric V. Smith wrote: > >> On Mar 6, 2022, at 5:05 AM, Barry Scott <ba...@barrys-emacs.org> wrote: >> >> >>> On 6 Mar 2022, at 07:19, t...@tomforb.es wrote: >>> >>> For reference, this request comes from running Dask[1] jobs. Dask handles >>> retrying and tracking tasks across machines but if you're dealing with a >>> batch of inputs that reliably kills a worker it is really hard to debug, >>> moreso if it only happens ~12 hours into your job. At certain scales it's >>> quite hard to log every processing event reliably, and the overhead may not >>> be worth it for a 1 in 10,000,000 failure. >> >> I think that the core dump will get you an answer now. >> With your example you will have only 1 core dump to look at. >> >>> On 6 Mar 2022, at 08:29, t...@tomforb.es wrote: >>> >>> If anyone is interested, I had a play around with this and came up with a >>> pretty simple-ish implementation: >>> https://github.com/orf/cpython/pull/1/files. >> >> I wonder if you should just raise a bug against python for this and provide >> your PR for the implementation. > > I think that’s a good idea. You should make Victor Stinner nosy on the issue. > > Eric >
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/OXQMCYHHSL72JS76VR2J2HC2EO2ARKHP/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
