On Mon, 4 Apr 2022 at 01:10, malmiteria <martin.mi...@ensc.fr> wrote: > > ROUND 2 @everyone > > this is... a lenghty post to say the least. > That should give you the 'full' picture.
Incredibly lengthy. And is it still based on the fundamental assumption that super() calls THE parent class? Because if so, there's not a lot to salvage, and quite frankly, I don't have the time to read that long a post. If the proposals are actually independent, maybe propose them one at a time? ChrisA _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/UTEOMO7E5UAOMRFNK346SXZGJ6DEKI5B/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
