Matsuoka Takuo writes:
> For your particular case of a diamond, the solution below seems
> simpler to me than yours. What problems may it create which your
> solution won't? Or you might refine the problem. It's not easy to
> see the real value of your suggestions.
>
> ```
> class HighGobelin:
> def scream(self):
> self._speak()
> print("raAaaaAar")
> def _speak(self):
> return
>
> class CorruptedGobelin(HighGobelin):
> def _speak(self):
> print("my corrupted soul makes me wanna scream")
>
> class ProudGobelin(HighGobelin):
> def _speak(self):
> print("I ... can't ... contain my scream!")
>
> class HalfBreed(ProudGobelin, CorruptedGobelin):
> @property
> def _speak(self):
> return super(
> __class__ if random.choices([True, False])
> else ProudGobelin,
> self
> )._speak
> ```
>
> Best regards,
> Takuo Matsuoka
There's a few problems, mainly, if you provide ProudGobelin and
CorruptedGobelin as a lib author, you're very likely not to think of the
HalfBreed use case, so the lib users wanting to create the HalfBreed class is
bared from this solution, as it requires some work on ProudGobelin and
CorruptedGobelin classes.
Another one is that even if you're not in the case of a lib, you're likely not
to think of this solution (depending on your skills / experiences with python),
and not to identify the problem on its own, and debugging it will be a
nightmare, unless you already know about super tendency to jump sideway.
The problem is not that we can't come up with solutions now.
Thanks for your constructive participation :)
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/CXSL5YFIDR5423465WGA3DYXDY5273N3/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
