Devin Jeanpierre writes: > Is it unreasonable to instead suggest generalizing the assignment target > for parameters? For example, if parameter assignment happened left to > right, and allowed more than just variables, then one could do: > > def __init__(self, self.x, self.y): pass
At a glance, this is the most attractive syntax I've seen for this. If you're a keystroke minimizer, you can't do quite as well as def __init__(self, @x, @y): pass but def __init__(s, s.x, s.y): pass isn't bad at all. > > Python 2 had non-variable parameters (but not attributes, just unpacking: > def foo((x, y)): pass), but it was removed in Python 3, because of issues > with introspection (among other, perhaps less significant, issues): > https://peps.python.org/pep-3113/ > > Perhaps now that positional-only parameters exist, and the introspection > APIs have evolved over time, there is a way to work this into the > introspection APIs sensibly. > > (a "@foo" parameter does not have this problem, because it's just a > parameter named `foo` with some extra stuff.) > > -- Devin > _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org > To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ > Message archived at > https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/UY2TQTPRFAPN3OG3TBPCOYMAYZWFZ3E4/ > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/KBWASQWSLY2TAOTU6KKJI433SGOFM2JX/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
