> On 8 Jun 2022, at 16:09, Rob Cliffe via Python-ideas 
> <python-ideas@python.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On 08/06/2022 15:40, Eric V. Smith via Python-ideas wrote:
>> 
>>> On 6/7/2022 4:59 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>> On Wed, 8 Jun 2022 at 00:36, <martineznicolas41...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hello!
>>>> 
>>>> Do you know if there has been discussions around why is the default 
>>>> argument is positional only in the dict methods get and pop?
>>>> 
>>>> I think
>>>> 
>>>> ```
>>>> d.get(key, default=3)
>>>> ```
>>>> 
>>>> way more readable than
>>>> 
>>>> ```
>>>> d.get(key, 3)
>>>> ```
>>>> 
>>>> specially since max and min builtin functions use default as a keyword 
>>>> argument.
>>> With min and max, it MUST be a keyword argument, because positional
>>> arguments are the values to be compared. So I think the main reason is
>>> "because nobody ever bothered to do it". If there's enough value in
>>> it, that could probably be changed, although mere consistency alone
>>> isn't a very strong argument.
>> 
>> I suspect it's been this way because the API is so old. Now that we have 
>> Argument Clinic it would be easier to implement as a keyword argument. But 
>> there may also be a performance issue with keyword arguments vs. positional. 
>> People are touchy when it comes to dicts!
>> 
>> Eric
> True (and rightly so).  But all that is required is that there is no 
> significant slow-down when the positional argument is used.
> Does that sound feasible?
> People can always choose not to use the keyword form.


Won’t the code have to check for a keyword even if a positional is used and 
therefore it must be slower. Need a benchmark to know by how much.

I’m one of those people that notice uS slow does in access to some APIs.

Barry

> Best wishes
> Rob Cliffe
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
>> Message archived at 
>> https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/73OOS3YPUDTZVWFJ5V44X66XZCNXRQV6/
>> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
> Message archived at 
> https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/LMVZXUZQAJ4PRKWGTQDP45FS5YDRKRZG/
> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/SF2TJG6XL37UMZOQCPGZDV5XUDKCKETW/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to