> On 14 Nov 2022, at 14:31, James Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I wrote the attached python (3) code to improve on existing prng functions. I > used the time module for one method, which resulted in disproportionate odd > values, but agreeable means. > > I used the hashlib module for the second. It is evident that the code is > amateur, but the program might result in better PRN generation. > > The "app" lends itself to checking, using statistical tools (see comments.)
Have you used any cryptographic tools to prove the quality of your PRNG? What results did you get? How does your PRNG compare to what python already has? Without that this analysis this will be unlikely to be considered as a candidate for python stdlib. Barry > > I remain a fan, > > James Johnson > <testrandom.py> > _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ > Message archived at > https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/VENAT2YTVYVHTBSEVHHMIURCU6MG2CEO/ > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/HWQV4AKQAUM7CY4NWS2IRIVLRAYMKR3V/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
