Hi Barry,
Your reply could easily be read as "this is a bad idea, and you shouldn't have
bothered writing it down". I hope that was not your intention, and instead it
comes from handling self-indulgent people expecting things from you all day. I
know, I get those requests too. I'll assume that was not your intention in my
answers below.
Barry Scott wrote:
> I think this has been discussed before and rejected.
Do you have a link to that discussion, or is this just from memory? What should
I search for to find this discussion? Why was it rejected?
> Your need 2 things to happen
> (1) a syntax change in python that is acceptable
> (2) a significant editor to support syntax highlighting for that python
> change.
> (3) someone willing to write and support the feature in the python code base
I understand all these 3 things are needed. I'm saying that I think this
feature is worth it. Do you mean I should do things in a separate order? We are
in the idea stage, before a (1) strict syntax can be suggested.
> Will you write and support the code?
Is commiting to write the code a requirement to suggest an idea? Or course this
is required down the line, but let's see if this is a good idea first?
> If the tags are called as functions then you can do it today with this:
> def html(s):
> return s
> HEAD = html('<head>')
If I'm not missing anything, this doesn't help with syntax highlighting?
Highlighting is the problem I'm talking about in my post above.
Regards,
Emil
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/TTED5M26SNXR6JKI4RAS77RGEHXOGR2O/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
