On Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 9:48 AM David Mertz, Ph.D. <[email protected]> wrote:
> In general, I find any proposal to change Python "because then my text > editor would need to > change to accommodate the language" to be unconvincing. > Personally, I’m skeptical of any proposal to change Python to make it easier for IDEs. But there *may* be other good reasons to do something like this. I’m not a static typing guy, but it segg do me that it could be useful to subtype strings: This function expects an SQL string. This function returns an SQL string. Maybe not worth the overhead, but worth more than giving IDEs hints SATO what to do. -CHB -- Christopher Barker, PhD (Chris) Python Language Consulting - Teaching - Scientific Software Development - Desktop GUI and Web Development - wxPython, numpy, scipy, Cython
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/UUDANPFKWV66IN3DXGTS3VQ6A7XY6YIX/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
