https://peps.python.org/pep-0661/
On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 9:58 AM Dom Grigonis <[email protected]> wrote: > This has been bugging me for a long time. It seems that python doesn’t > have a convention for “Undefined” type. > > When I started using python I naturally used None for it (as advised). > > However, the more I work with python, the more I find that None is a > meaningful type. And it is a type that is convenient to use in a lot of > cases, where it is not actually “None”. > > One big example is: > numpy: array[None, :] > > Another is simple cascading of defaults. > E.g. > > ```python > class A: > def __init__(self, default=’string'): > self.default = default > > def method(self, default=None): > default = default if default is not None else self.default > dct[‘key’] = other_dict.get(‘key’, default) > return to_json(dct) > ``` > > None has a logic in `some_func`, which is important. > Now if I want to enforce None passed to to_json I have no way to do it. > > I know there are many workarounds for this, but there is no `consistent` > way of doing this. > > I have been using Ellipsis in the past, but it doesn’t feel right, because > it also has a meaning and I might need to use those functions with e.g. > numpy in he future and will have to change it. > > Now, I came back to this issue again and my latest solution is to just > define: > UNDEFINED = object() > in library constants.py > > Then code above is very clear and I think this is a good and sustainable > solution. > > I know, that in a way ’None’ is already this, but it is generally used in > 2 ways: > 1. A variable/argument is undefined in python space > 2. Global indication, that a value is undefined (e.g. equivalence of null > in json) > > What I am proposing is to have 1 more constant in python ‘Undefined’, > which will indicate ‘Undefined’ in python space and leave None to be used > in more general sense. > > I also found this article while looking for solution just now: > > https://levelup.gitconnected.com/python-why-none-is-not-nothing-bb3de55dd471 > It seems that people who use typing are also running into ambiguities and > trying to hack something together. > I avoid typing until its 99% mature so can't comment more on this. > > What are your thoughts? Am I onto something or am I missing something? > Anyone else had similar encounters? > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ > Message archived at > https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/RGUNJYXWHE7UM2W6FCAMGLJVLXEYHA2Q/ > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ > -- The dead increasingly dominate and strangle both the living and the not-yet born. Vampiric capital and undead corporate persons abuse the lives and control the thoughts of homo faber. Ideas, once born, become abortifacients against new conceptions.
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/YTCPDFDUZTMTXS5LYHKCYJ23WVMPE6CL/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
