*puts on contributor hat* Well all right then! Filed https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/109849, recapping this and asking some questions about the specifics. I'll try to put together a PR.
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 3:49 AM Stephen J. Turnbull < turnbull.stephen...@u.tsukuba.ac.jp> wrote: > Samuel Freilich via Python-ideas writes: > > > This might all be too much thought about edge cases that don't > > matter, but given the *_ns() functions in the time module (PEP > > 564), I'm curious why datetime doesn't have a constructor that > > takes an integer timestamp with the full precision that supports. > > This is such an obvious improvement that the only answer I can think > of is "Because you haven't submitted a merge request yet?" ;-) > > TBH honest you're right about the edge case, mostly datetime is about > talking to humans and that's almost by definition not worth the time > of a core dev to shave nanoseconds off the operation. But if someone > is looking for a chance to put in a patch, this looks likely to be > approved to me. > > >
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/N3GSWPC3EXKBRZDRBGTJ35FFDUS7ICFP/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
