> The most notable difference I saw when I read introductions to django was > how to do queries, which now it seems django improved, even though I think I > still prefer the sqlobject and sqlalchemy way. > > For me, Django's db model does a pretty good job of delivering relational database power without forcing me to learn sql. What's more it makes it easier to support non-relational databases at the back-end, i.e. google's big table.
I'm sure that for someone with sql experience, sql* works better. For someone with my very limited sql experience, select and where are confusing. I like Django for hiding the sql parts and using python taxonomy whenever possible. I think the 1.1 changes Idan showed are a positive evolution - finding more pythonic ways to get more juice out of the db - but I don't think Django will never completely satisfy an sql perfectionist :-) g'night, Benny --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PyWeb-IL" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pyweb-il?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
_______________________________________________ Python-il mailing list [email protected] http://hamakor.org.il/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-il
