On Wed, 30 May 2012 08:41:57 +0300 Alon Levy <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Shlomi Fish <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Ram, > > > > On Tue, 29 May 2012 23:15:39 +0300 > > Ram Rachum <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hey guys, > > > > > > Just a quick recommendation on a module called pudb: > > > > > > http://pypi.python.org/pypi/pudb > > > > > > Pudb is a replacement for Python's pdb, for Linux only. > > > > > > > Thanks for the recommendation. Too bad that I now need to debug some > > Python code on Windows (don't ask). > > > > > There were so many times that I had to debug a Python program through > > SSH, > > > where I can't use my normal debugger (Wing IDE). I really *really* hate > > > using pdb because *you can't see anything* and if you dare to create a > > > variable named `q` it will end the debugging session, and other assorted > > > stupidities. > > > > I wonder why it's not possible (yet) to do remote debugging in Python. I > > mean, > > there's remote editing with SFTP/FTP/WebDAV/etc., which many editors > > support, > > and GDB also has gdbserver: > > > > There is remote debugging with winpdb, despite the name it has nothing to > do with windows. otoh I don't see why it wouldn't work there (haven't > tried). It optionally encrypts the traffic between the debuggee and the > debugger too. http://winpdb.org/ Sounds good. Thanks for the recommendation. Regards, Shlomi Fish -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/ What Makes Software Apps High Quality - http://shlom.in/sw-quality “We’re not doing it for money… we’re doing it for a shitload of money!” — Spaceballs, http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0094012/ Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - http://shlom.in/reply . _______________________________________________ Python-il mailing list [email protected] http://hamakor.org.il/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-il
