I have to work with IBM Directory Server on a regular basis, and that
includes some nasty schema analysis for moving some history local schema
modifications to new versions of the product.
I was able to use ldap.schema to simplify most of the nastiness.
However, IBM extends the schema with the additional attribute
IBMAttributetypes, which describes chracteristics of how attributes will be
stored in the backend.
IBM was polite enough to document the grammar for this new attribute and
I'll be attempting to create an IBMAttributetype class to hold these.
Now, should I just add the new class to ldap.schema.models and submit a
patch once done? Or should a long term approach of being able to indicate
the addition of server specific extensions be contemplated?
Thanks,
Chris Dukes
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Python-LDAP-dev mailing list
Python-LDAP-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/python-ldap-dev
