Fredrik Lundh wrote:
Mike C. Fletcher wrote:
yeah actually i saw what Fedrik had to say above. I created a sliced
copy of the l & did my homework within the for loop
You might want to check it again before you hand it in ;) ...
...
that's not the code he quoted in the mail you replied to, though...
Ah, my mistake, I missed the [:] after the source argument that was
taking a copy... which brings up the question, how many other people
would miss it? Guess it's just a matter of how often you see the
pattern, so you begin to expect the [:] and either look for it or take
it for granted (hmm, another source of bugs?).
Apologies for any unnecessary alarm,
Mike
________________________________________________
Mike C. Fletcher
Designer, VR Plumber, Coder
http://www.vrplumber.com
http://blog.vrplumber.com
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
