In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bulba! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Nope. That is not what I'm arguing. Really, I think you have >jumped to conclusion about that: I merely pointed out that >I don't like what I perceive as end effect of what GPL license >writers are attempting to achieve: vendor lock-in. > >I think I stated that clearly.
And my counter-argument is that I believe your perception is wrong. If I agreed with your focus on lock-in, I'd say that what the GPL is trying to lock in is a specific legal philosophy by subverting the existing system. -- Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ "19. A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing." --Alan Perlis -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
