John Machin wrote:
Nick Coghlan wrote:
The effbot's version is still going to be faster though:
  lst = [x for x in lst if x != 2]


Have you measured this?

Nope. I'm going purely on the fact that it is O(n), and the in-place modification will always be worse than that.


Cheers,
Nick.

--
Nick Coghlan   |   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |   Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
            http://boredomandlaziness.skystorm.net
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to