Timothy Fitz wrote: > On 19 Jan 2005 15:24:10 -0800, Carl Banks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The gist of "Flat is better than nested" is "be as nested as you have > > to be, no more," because being too nested is just a mess. > > Which I agree with, and which makes sense. However your "gist" is a > different meaning. It's not that "Flat is better than nested" it's > that "Too flat is bad and too flat is nested so be as nested (or as > flat) as you have to be and no more." Perhaps Tim Peters is far too > concise for my feeble mind <wink>
Couldn't you say the same about Simple and Complex? or Explicit and Implicit? -- CARL BANKS -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list