Op 2005-01-21, Bengt Richter schreef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 20 Jan 2005 14:07:57 GMT, Antoon Pardon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Would you like a dictionary that acts as you want and takes care of all > problems internally, and accepts keys and values of any type without wrapping > or other modification -- or do you want a wrapper that can make any object > suitable for use as key or value in python's curent definition of dict? > > Just DYFR please. You still haven't you know ;-)
My feeling is that I'm hungry and would like to eat and you ask whether my requirements are a sandwhich or a bowl of soup. :-) The real requirement IMO is that any attempt to mutate an object wont result in a mutated key. Both proposals seem to solve that. The second is at the moment for me the most interesting to discuss, since it is a new approach to me, and most likely to learn me something new. -- Antoon Pardon -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
